民事抗诉案件里检查机关调查取证权利使用的边界

　　民事诉讼法存在一个不置可否的问题：检察机关能否在民事抗诉案中获得调查取证权。赋予检察机关在民事抗诉案中拥有取证权在现实和理论中都有着独特的意义。长久以来，因为并没有很好的让取证权归位，该权利并没有发挥应有的作用，对案件还是权利本身都造成伤害。最新一次的民事诉讼法修改又一次提到取证权，通过此次修法对检察机关在民事抗诉中的调查取证权行使的边界时机已经成熟。

　　Civil law exists a noncommittal question: Can the prosecution in civil rights investigation and evidence obtained Kang Suan. Kang Suan gives prosecutors have evidence in civil rights in reality and theory have a unique meaning. For a long time, because there is no good evidence right homing to the right and did not play its due role, or the rights of the case itself cause harm. Last modified once again referred to the Civil Procedure Law forensics right by amending the law on the prosecution in the investigation of civil protest in the exercise of the right boundary of the time is ripe.